IPMS-HAMS

Houston Automotive Modeler's Society

 

 

Zone Of Possible Agreement Ppt

Posted on October 18th, 2021 in Uncategorized by

 

A “possible area of agreement” (ZOPA) exists when there is a potential agreement that would benefit both parties more than their alternative options. For example, if Fred wants to buy a used car for $5,000 or less, and Mary wants to sell one for $4,500, these two have a ZOPA. But if Mary doesn`t go below $7,000 and Fred doesn`t go above $5,000, they don`t have a possible area of agreement. As stated throughout the “Mastery of Negotiation” course, a big part of the interaction in a negotiation is shaping the perception of ZOPA through persuasion and other tactical steps, as this is more likely to lead to an agreement. The Possible Entente Zone (ZOPA) is the area of a negotiation where two or more parties can find common ground. Here, the negotiating parties can work towards a common goal and reach a possible agreement that incorporates at least some of the other`s ideas. ZOPA is sometimes referred to as a “trading area” or a “trading area”. If the negotiating parties cannot reach the ZOPA, they are in a negative negotiating zone. An agreement cannot be reached in a negative negotiating area, as the needs and wishes of all parties cannot be satisfied by an agreement reached in these circumstances. When both parties know that their BATNA and positions are disappearing, the parties should be able to communicate, evaluate the proposed agreements and, possibly, identify zoPA. However, the parties often do not know their own BATNA and even less often know the BATNA on the other side. Often, parties claim to have a better alternative than they actually do, because good alternatives usually lead to more power in negotiations. This is explained in more detail in the BATNA trial.

However, the result of such deception could be the obvious absence of a ZOPA – and thus a failed negotiation if a ZOPA actually existed. Common uncertainties can also affect the parties` ability to assess potential agreements, as parties may be unrealistically optimistic or pessimistic about the possibility of an agreement or the value of other options. [2] A ZOPA exists when there is an overlap between the booking price of each party (final result). A negative trading area is when there is no overlap. With a negative negotiating zone, both sides can (and should) leave. If the conditions that both sides want to accept overlap, there should be a positive negotiating area. That is, the conditions to which the buyer accepts are clearly in accordance with the conditions that the seller is willing to accept. However, negative negotiating areas can be overcome if the negotiating parties are willing to experience the wishes and needs of the other. For example, let`s say Dave explains to Suzy that he wants to use the proceeds from the sale of the bike to buy new skis and ski equipment. Suzy has a pair of gently used high-quality skis that she is ready to part with. Dave is willing to take less money for the mountain bike if Suzy throws away the used skis. Both parties have reached a ZOPA and can therefore conclude a fruitful agreement.

When you start a negotiation, you rarely know how big the ZOPA is or if there is room for a deal. .

<< Back to Home

 
Comments are closed.

Categories:

Archives: