IPMS-HAMS

Houston Automotive Modeler's Society

 

 

Hold Harmless Agreement Translate

Posted on September 22nd, 2021 in Uncategorized by

 

A blocking clause does not always protect against lawsuits or liability. Some States do not respect agreements that are harmless, nebulous or too broad in the language. In addition, the clause may be considered invalid if signatories present a strong argument that they have been compelled or led to sign a blocking clause. Instead, the court noted that “if two words are used in a contract, the rule of construction is that the words have different meanings.” And he continued to build a confusing argument that distinguishes compensation from keeping harmless, but not in the way proposed by the management company: companies that offer high-risk activities like skydiving often use a no-detention clause. While this is not an absolute protection of liability, it indicates that the client has identified certain risks and agreed to take them. This harmless clause can take the form of a letter. It is not surprising that the court did not cite a single authority for this proposal. I think it`s a pure invention and can be ignored. With regard to the construction rule that led the tribunal to seek a distinction between compensation and maintenance of damage, it and other such design rules constitute the abdication of a court`s responsibility to try to determine the intention of the parties. (I intend to write about building rules.) The Court of Appeal set aside the decision by stating that indemnification agreements normally relate to third-party claims and not to situations in which one party claims that a contract supposedly dismisses it from any liability to the other party.

One of the arguments put forward by the management company in favor of its absurd argument was that, even if compensation would not exempt you from debts to the indemnity party, words that are harmless would get this release. I would now like to come back to this issue, as a reader was kind enough to give me a recent California case concerning compensation and damage management, namely queen Villas Homeowners Association v. TCB Property Management, 2007 Cal. App. Lexis 470 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2007). It`s worth thinking about. (Click here for a copy of this case.) A company can add a secure blocking agreement to a contract if maintaining the service to be received involves risks for which the company does not wish to be held legally or financially responsible.

Are the words “compensate” and “keep unharmed” synonymous? No.One is offensive and the other defensive – even though both civil liability situations are considered.. . .

<< Back to Home

 
Comments are closed.

Categories:

Archives: